Question 1 Topic 3.1 · Apply it
Literary narrative: "The Radio" (1) The radio had been silent for eleven years when Nadia found it in the back of her grandfather's closet, wrapped in a faded blue towel. It was larger than she expected: a wooden box with a cloth front and two brass knobs, one of them missing its cap. (2) "That was your grandmother's," Grandpa Yusuf said from the doorway. He didn't come any closer. "She listened to the evening news on it every night. After she passed, I couldn't stand the quiet it made when it was off, so I stopped turning it on." (3) Nadia set the radio on the kitchen table. She had fixed her friends' phones and her own bike more times than she could count, and she liked the feeling of a problem giving way, piece by piece. She asked if she could try. Her grandfather shrugged, which she had learned meant yes. (4) For three evenings she worked at the table while he read the newspaper in the next chair, pretending not to watch. She found a broken wire, cleaned rust from the contacts and ordered a replacement part online. Each time she tested the radio, the speaker gave only a dry hiss. (5) On the fourth evening, the hiss broke into a man's voice reading the weather. Nadia turned, grinning, but her grandfather had put down his paper. He was leaning toward the radio with his eyes closed, and for a long moment neither of them said anything. (6) "Same station," he finally said. "She always had it on this one." He reached over and turned the volume up a little.
The passage is mainly about:
A a young woman learning how radios work in a school class. B a grandfather teaching his granddaughter to repair electronics. C a young woman repairing an old radio and the effect this has on her grandfather. D a family arguing about whether to sell an old radio.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 2 Topic 3.1 · Apply it
Literary narrative: "The Radio" (1) The radio had been silent for eleven years when Nadia found it in the back of her grandfather's closet, wrapped in a faded blue towel. It was larger than she expected: a wooden box with a cloth front and two brass knobs, one of them missing its cap. (2) "That was your grandmother's," Grandpa Yusuf said from the doorway. He didn't come any closer. "She listened to the evening news on it every night. After she passed, I couldn't stand the quiet it made when it was off, so I stopped turning it on." (3) Nadia set the radio on the kitchen table. She had fixed her friends' phones and her own bike more times than she could count, and she liked the feeling of a problem giving way, piece by piece. She asked if she could try. Her grandfather shrugged, which she had learned meant yes. (4) For three evenings she worked at the table while he read the newspaper in the next chair, pretending not to watch. She found a broken wire, cleaned rust from the contacts and ordered a replacement part online. Each time she tested the radio, the speaker gave only a dry hiss. (5) On the fourth evening, the hiss broke into a man's voice reading the weather. Nadia turned, grinning, but her grandfather had put down his paper. He was leaning toward the radio with his eyes closed, and for a long moment neither of them said anything. (6) "Same station," he finally said. "She always had it on this one." He reached over and turned the volume up a little.
According to the passage, Grandpa Yusuf stopped turning on the radio because:
A the silence after he turned it off reminded him of his loss. B the radio was broken when his wife died. C he preferred reading the newspaper. D the station his wife liked stopped broadcasting.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 3 Topic 3.1 · Apply it
Literary narrative: "The Radio" (1) The radio had been silent for eleven years when Nadia found it in the back of her grandfather's closet, wrapped in a faded blue towel. It was larger than she expected: a wooden box with a cloth front and two brass knobs, one of them missing its cap. (2) "That was your grandmother's," Grandpa Yusuf said from the doorway. He didn't come any closer. "She listened to the evening news on it every night. After she passed, I couldn't stand the quiet it made when it was off, so I stopped turning it on." (3) Nadia set the radio on the kitchen table. She had fixed her friends' phones and her own bike more times than she could count, and she liked the feeling of a problem giving way, piece by piece. She asked if she could try. Her grandfather shrugged, which she had learned meant yes. (4) For three evenings she worked at the table while he read the newspaper in the next chair, pretending not to watch. She found a broken wire, cleaned rust from the contacts and ordered a replacement part online. Each time she tested the radio, the speaker gave only a dry hiss. (5) On the fourth evening, the hiss broke into a man's voice reading the weather. Nadia turned, grinning, but her grandfather had put down his paper. He was leaning toward the radio with his eyes closed, and for a long moment neither of them said anything. (6) "Same station," he finally said. "She always had it on this one." He reached over and turned the volume up a little.
In paragraph 3, the grandfather's shrug indicates that he:
A doesn't understand Nadia's question. B wants Nadia to stop asking about the radio. C thinks the radio can't be fixed. D agrees to let Nadia try to fix the radio.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 4 Topic 3.2 · Apply it
Literary narrative: "The Radio" (1) The radio had been silent for eleven years when Nadia found it in the back of her grandfather's closet, wrapped in a faded blue towel. It was larger than she expected: a wooden box with a cloth front and two brass knobs, one of them missing its cap. (2) "That was your grandmother's," Grandpa Yusuf said from the doorway. He didn't come any closer. "She listened to the evening news on it every night. After she passed, I couldn't stand the quiet it made when it was off, so I stopped turning it on." (3) Nadia set the radio on the kitchen table. She had fixed her friends' phones and her own bike more times than she could count, and she liked the feeling of a problem giving way, piece by piece. She asked if she could try. Her grandfather shrugged, which she had learned meant yes. (4) For three evenings she worked at the table while he read the newspaper in the next chair, pretending not to watch. She found a broken wire, cleaned rust from the contacts and ordered a replacement part online. Each time she tested the radio, the speaker gave only a dry hiss. (5) On the fourth evening, the hiss broke into a man's voice reading the weather. Nadia turned, grinning, but her grandfather had put down his paper. He was leaning toward the radio with his eyes closed, and for a long moment neither of them said anything. (6) "Same station," he finally said. "She always had it on this one." He reached over and turned the volume up a little.
As it is used in paragraph 3, the phrase "giving way" most nearly means:
A being solved. B collapsing. C stepping aside. D becoming generous.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 5 Topic 3.1 · Apply it
Literary narrative: "The Radio" (1) The radio had been silent for eleven years when Nadia found it in the back of her grandfather's closet, wrapped in a faded blue towel. It was larger than she expected: a wooden box with a cloth front and two brass knobs, one of them missing its cap. (2) "That was your grandmother's," Grandpa Yusuf said from the doorway. He didn't come any closer. "She listened to the evening news on it every night. After she passed, I couldn't stand the quiet it made when it was off, so I stopped turning it on." (3) Nadia set the radio on the kitchen table. She had fixed her friends' phones and her own bike more times than she could count, and she liked the feeling of a problem giving way, piece by piece. She asked if she could try. Her grandfather shrugged, which she had learned meant yes. (4) For three evenings she worked at the table while he read the newspaper in the next chair, pretending not to watch. She found a broken wire, cleaned rust from the contacts and ordered a replacement part online. Each time she tested the radio, the speaker gave only a dry hiss. (5) On the fourth evening, the hiss broke into a man's voice reading the weather. Nadia turned, grinning, but her grandfather had put down his paper. He was leaning toward the radio with his eyes closed, and for a long moment neither of them said anything. (6) "Same station," he finally said. "She always had it on this one." He reached over and turned the volume up a little.
In paragraph 4, the detail that the grandfather was "pretending not to watch" suggests that he:
A was annoyed by the noise Nadia made. B was more interested in Nadia's work than he wanted to show. C had no interest in the radio. D was trying to learn how to fix radios himself.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 6 Topic 3.2 · Apply it
Literary narrative: "The Radio" (1) The radio had been silent for eleven years when Nadia found it in the back of her grandfather's closet, wrapped in a faded blue towel. It was larger than she expected: a wooden box with a cloth front and two brass knobs, one of them missing its cap. (2) "That was your grandmother's," Grandpa Yusuf said from the doorway. He didn't come any closer. "She listened to the evening news on it every night. After she passed, I couldn't stand the quiet it made when it was off, so I stopped turning it on." (3) Nadia set the radio on the kitchen table. She had fixed her friends' phones and her own bike more times than she could count, and she liked the feeling of a problem giving way, piece by piece. She asked if she could try. Her grandfather shrugged, which she had learned meant yes. (4) For three evenings she worked at the table while he read the newspaper in the next chair, pretending not to watch. She found a broken wire, cleaned rust from the contacts and ordered a replacement part online. Each time she tested the radio, the speaker gave only a dry hiss. (5) On the fourth evening, the hiss broke into a man's voice reading the weather. Nadia turned, grinning, but her grandfather had put down his paper. He was leaning toward the radio with his eyes closed, and for a long moment neither of them said anything. (6) "Same station," he finally said. "She always had it on this one." He reached over and turned the volume up a little.
The detail that one knob was "missing its cap" (paragraph 1) mainly serves to:
A explain why the radio couldn't be turned on. B show that Nadia is careless with old objects. C emphasize that the radio is old and worn. D suggest that the grandfather broke the radio on purpose.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 7 Topic 3.1 · Apply it
Literary narrative: "The Radio" (1) The radio had been silent for eleven years when Nadia found it in the back of her grandfather's closet, wrapped in a faded blue towel. It was larger than she expected: a wooden box with a cloth front and two brass knobs, one of them missing its cap. (2) "That was your grandmother's," Grandpa Yusuf said from the doorway. He didn't come any closer. "She listened to the evening news on it every night. After she passed, I couldn't stand the quiet it made when it was off, so I stopped turning it on." (3) Nadia set the radio on the kitchen table. She had fixed her friends' phones and her own bike more times than she could count, and she liked the feeling of a problem giving way, piece by piece. She asked if she could try. Her grandfather shrugged, which she had learned meant yes. (4) For three evenings she worked at the table while he read the newspaper in the next chair, pretending not to watch. She found a broken wire, cleaned rust from the contacts and ordered a replacement part online. Each time she tested the radio, the speaker gave only a dry hiss. (5) On the fourth evening, the hiss broke into a man's voice reading the weather. Nadia turned, grinning, but her grandfather had put down his paper. He was leaning toward the radio with his eyes closed, and for a long moment neither of them said anything. (6) "Same station," he finally said. "She always had it on this one." He reached over and turned the volume up a little.
Which of the following events happens last in the passage?
A Nadia finds a broken wire. B Nadia orders a replacement part. C Nadia hears a man reading the weather. D Grandpa Yusuf turns up the volume.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 8 Topic 3.2 · Apply it
Literary narrative: "The Radio" (1) The radio had been silent for eleven years when Nadia found it in the back of her grandfather's closet, wrapped in a faded blue towel. It was larger than she expected: a wooden box with a cloth front and two brass knobs, one of them missing its cap. (2) "That was your grandmother's," Grandpa Yusuf said from the doorway. He didn't come any closer. "She listened to the evening news on it every night. After she passed, I couldn't stand the quiet it made when it was off, so I stopped turning it on." (3) Nadia set the radio on the kitchen table. She had fixed her friends' phones and her own bike more times than she could count, and she liked the feeling of a problem giving way, piece by piece. She asked if she could try. Her grandfather shrugged, which she had learned meant yes. (4) For three evenings she worked at the table while he read the newspaper in the next chair, pretending not to watch. She found a broken wire, cleaned rust from the contacts and ordered a replacement part online. Each time she tested the radio, the speaker gave only a dry hiss. (5) On the fourth evening, the hiss broke into a man's voice reading the weather. Nadia turned, grinning, but her grandfather had put down his paper. He was leaning toward the radio with his eyes closed, and for a long moment neither of them said anything. (6) "Same station," he finally said. "She always had it on this one." He reached over and turned the volume up a little.
The point of view from which the passage is told is best described as that of:
A Nadia, speaking in the first person. B Grandpa Yusuf, looking back on his life. C a third-person narrator who focuses mainly on Nadia. D a third-person narrator who describes the thoughts of every character equally.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 9 Topic 3.1 · Apply it
Literary narrative: "The Radio" (1) The radio had been silent for eleven years when Nadia found it in the back of her grandfather's closet, wrapped in a faded blue towel. It was larger than she expected: a wooden box with a cloth front and two brass knobs, one of them missing its cap. (2) "That was your grandmother's," Grandpa Yusuf said from the doorway. He didn't come any closer. "She listened to the evening news on it every night. After she passed, I couldn't stand the quiet it made when it was off, so I stopped turning it on." (3) Nadia set the radio on the kitchen table. She had fixed her friends' phones and her own bike more times than she could count, and she liked the feeling of a problem giving way, piece by piece. She asked if she could try. Her grandfather shrugged, which she had learned meant yes. (4) For three evenings she worked at the table while he read the newspaper in the next chair, pretending not to watch. She found a broken wire, cleaned rust from the contacts and ordered a replacement part online. Each time she tested the radio, the speaker gave only a dry hiss. (5) On the fourth evening, the hiss broke into a man's voice reading the weather. Nadia turned, grinning, but her grandfather had put down his paper. He was leaning toward the radio with his eyes closed, and for a long moment neither of them said anything. (6) "Same station," he finally said. "She always had it on this one." He reached over and turned the volume up a little.
The final paragraph most strongly suggests that Grandpa Yusuf:
A has begun to welcome the radio back into his life. B is angry that Nadia changed the station. C wants Nadia to put the radio back in the closet. D no longer remembers his wife's habits.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 10 Topic 3.1 · Apply it
Social science: "Why Shared Bikes Spread" (1) In the last two decades, bike-sharing programs have appeared in hundreds of cities around the world. The idea is simple: riders pick up a bicycle at one station, ride it across town and leave it at another. Yet many of the earliest experiments with shared bikes, in the 1960s and 1970s, failed. Bikes left free on the street were often stolen or damaged, and no one was responsible for repairing them. (2) Modern systems have succeeded largely because of technology. Docking stations lock each bike in place, and riders unlock one with a card or a phone app that records who has it. Because every trip is linked to a user, bikes are far less likely to disappear. Sensors also tell operators which stations are running empty, so workers can move bikes to where they are needed. (3) Bike sharing has also benefited from a shift in how city planners think about streets. Many planners now see cycling not as a hobby but as part of the transportation system, like buses and trains. Shared bikes can cover the "last mile" between a train station and a rider's home or office, a trip that is often too long to walk comfortably but too short to be worth driving. (4) Still, bike sharing is not a cure for every city's problems. Systems work best where stations are close together and streets feel safe for cyclists. In neighborhoods with few protected bike lanes, many residents remain unwilling to ride, no matter how convenient the bikes are. For bike sharing to keep growing, cities must invest in the streets as well as the bikes.
Which statement best expresses the main idea of the passage?
A Bike sharing has failed in most cities that have tried it. B Modern bike-sharing programs succeeded where earlier ones failed, but their success depends on conditions in each city. C Cities should replace buses and trains with shared bikes. D Technology alone can solve a city's transportation problems.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 11 Topic 3.1 · Apply it
Social science: "Why Shared Bikes Spread" (1) In the last two decades, bike-sharing programs have appeared in hundreds of cities around the world. The idea is simple: riders pick up a bicycle at one station, ride it across town and leave it at another. Yet many of the earliest experiments with shared bikes, in the 1960s and 1970s, failed. Bikes left free on the street were often stolen or damaged, and no one was responsible for repairing them. (2) Modern systems have succeeded largely because of technology. Docking stations lock each bike in place, and riders unlock one with a card or a phone app that records who has it. Because every trip is linked to a user, bikes are far less likely to disappear. Sensors also tell operators which stations are running empty, so workers can move bikes to where they are needed. (3) Bike sharing has also benefited from a shift in how city planners think about streets. Many planners now see cycling not as a hobby but as part of the transportation system, like buses and trains. Shared bikes can cover the "last mile" between a train station and a rider's home or office, a trip that is often too long to walk comfortably but too short to be worth driving. (4) Still, bike sharing is not a cure for every city's problems. Systems work best where stations are close together and streets feel safe for cyclists. In neighborhoods with few protected bike lanes, many residents remain unwilling to ride, no matter how convenient the bikes are. For bike sharing to keep growing, cities must invest in the streets as well as the bikes.
According to the passage, many early bike-sharing experiments failed mainly because:
A the bikes were too expensive to buy. B few people knew how to ride bicycles. C bikes were stolen or damaged and no one was responsible for repairing them. D cities banned bicycles from main streets.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 12 Topic 3.1 · Apply it
Social science: "Why Shared Bikes Spread" (1) In the last two decades, bike-sharing programs have appeared in hundreds of cities around the world. The idea is simple: riders pick up a bicycle at one station, ride it across town and leave it at another. Yet many of the earliest experiments with shared bikes, in the 1960s and 1970s, failed. Bikes left free on the street were often stolen or damaged, and no one was responsible for repairing them. (2) Modern systems have succeeded largely because of technology. Docking stations lock each bike in place, and riders unlock one with a card or a phone app that records who has it. Because every trip is linked to a user, bikes are far less likely to disappear. Sensors also tell operators which stations are running empty, so workers can move bikes to where they are needed. (3) Bike sharing has also benefited from a shift in how city planners think about streets. Many planners now see cycling not as a hobby but as part of the transportation system, like buses and trains. Shared bikes can cover the "last mile" between a train station and a rider's home or office, a trip that is often too long to walk comfortably but too short to be worth driving. (4) Still, bike sharing is not a cure for every city's problems. Systems work best where stations are close together and streets feel safe for cyclists. In neighborhoods with few protected bike lanes, many residents remain unwilling to ride, no matter how convenient the bikes are. For bike sharing to keep growing, cities must invest in the streets as well as the bikes.
According to paragraph 2, linking every trip to a user made bikes:
A cheaper to rent. B faster to ride. C easier to find on a map. D far less likely to disappear.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 13 Topic 3.2 · Apply it
Social science: "Why Shared Bikes Spread" (1) In the last two decades, bike-sharing programs have appeared in hundreds of cities around the world. The idea is simple: riders pick up a bicycle at one station, ride it across town and leave it at another. Yet many of the earliest experiments with shared bikes, in the 1960s and 1970s, failed. Bikes left free on the street were often stolen or damaged, and no one was responsible for repairing them. (2) Modern systems have succeeded largely because of technology. Docking stations lock each bike in place, and riders unlock one with a card or a phone app that records who has it. Because every trip is linked to a user, bikes are far less likely to disappear. Sensors also tell operators which stations are running empty, so workers can move bikes to where they are needed. (3) Bike sharing has also benefited from a shift in how city planners think about streets. Many planners now see cycling not as a hobby but as part of the transportation system, like buses and trains. Shared bikes can cover the "last mile" between a train station and a rider's home or office, a trip that is often too long to walk comfortably but too short to be worth driving. (4) Still, bike sharing is not a cure for every city's problems. Systems work best where stations are close together and streets feel safe for cyclists. In neighborhoods with few protected bike lanes, many residents remain unwilling to ride, no matter how convenient the bikes are. For bike sharing to keep growing, cities must invest in the streets as well as the bikes.
As it is used in paragraph 3, the phrase "last mile" refers to:
A the final mile of a bicycle race. B the short distance between a transit stop and a rider's destination. C the longest trip a shared bike can make. D the last street a bike lane reaches.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 14 Topic 3.2 · Apply it
Social science: "Why Shared Bikes Spread" (1) In the last two decades, bike-sharing programs have appeared in hundreds of cities around the world. The idea is simple: riders pick up a bicycle at one station, ride it across town and leave it at another. Yet many of the earliest experiments with shared bikes, in the 1960s and 1970s, failed. Bikes left free on the street were often stolen or damaged, and no one was responsible for repairing them. (2) Modern systems have succeeded largely because of technology. Docking stations lock each bike in place, and riders unlock one with a card or a phone app that records who has it. Because every trip is linked to a user, bikes are far less likely to disappear. Sensors also tell operators which stations are running empty, so workers can move bikes to where they are needed. (3) Bike sharing has also benefited from a shift in how city planners think about streets. Many planners now see cycling not as a hobby but as part of the transportation system, like buses and trains. Shared bikes can cover the "last mile" between a train station and a rider's home or office, a trip that is often too long to walk comfortably but too short to be worth driving. (4) Still, bike sharing is not a cure for every city's problems. Systems work best where stations are close together and streets feel safe for cyclists. In neighborhoods with few protected bike lanes, many residents remain unwilling to ride, no matter how convenient the bikes are. For bike sharing to keep growing, cities must invest in the streets as well as the bikes.
The main function of paragraph 4 is to:
A describe how docking stations work. B explain why the earliest programs failed. C acknowledge limits of bike sharing and say what cities need to do. D compare bike sharing with car sharing.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 15 Topic 3.2 · Apply it
Social science: "Why Shared Bikes Spread" (1) In the last two decades, bike-sharing programs have appeared in hundreds of cities around the world. The idea is simple: riders pick up a bicycle at one station, ride it across town and leave it at another. Yet many of the earliest experiments with shared bikes, in the 1960s and 1970s, failed. Bikes left free on the street were often stolen or damaged, and no one was responsible for repairing them. (2) Modern systems have succeeded largely because of technology. Docking stations lock each bike in place, and riders unlock one with a card or a phone app that records who has it. Because every trip is linked to a user, bikes are far less likely to disappear. Sensors also tell operators which stations are running empty, so workers can move bikes to where they are needed. (3) Bike sharing has also benefited from a shift in how city planners think about streets. Many planners now see cycling not as a hobby but as part of the transportation system, like buses and trains. Shared bikes can cover the "last mile" between a train station and a rider's home or office, a trip that is often too long to walk comfortably but too short to be worth driving. (4) Still, bike sharing is not a cure for every city's problems. Systems work best where stations are close together and streets feel safe for cyclists. In neighborhoods with few protected bike lanes, many residents remain unwilling to ride, no matter how convenient the bikes are. For bike sharing to keep growing, cities must invest in the streets as well as the bikes.
The author's attitude toward bike sharing is best described as:
A generally positive but realistic about its limits. B completely enthusiastic. C strongly opposed. D uninterested.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 16 Topic 3.3 · Experiment
Social science: "Why Shared Bikes Spread" (1) In the last two decades, bike-sharing programs have appeared in hundreds of cities around the world. The idea is simple: riders pick up a bicycle at one station, ride it across town and leave it at another. Yet many of the earliest experiments with shared bikes, in the 1960s and 1970s, failed. Bikes left free on the street were often stolen or damaged, and no one was responsible for repairing them. (2) Modern systems have succeeded largely because of technology. Docking stations lock each bike in place, and riders unlock one with a card or a phone app that records who has it. Because every trip is linked to a user, bikes are far less likely to disappear. Sensors also tell operators which stations are running empty, so workers can move bikes to where they are needed. (3) Bike sharing has also benefited from a shift in how city planners think about streets. Many planners now see cycling not as a hobby but as part of the transportation system, like buses and trains. Shared bikes can cover the "last mile" between a train station and a rider's home or office, a trip that is often too long to walk comfortably but too short to be worth driving. (4) Still, bike sharing is not a cure for every city's problems. Systems work best where stations are close together and streets feel safe for cyclists. In neighborhoods with few protected bike lanes, many residents remain unwilling to ride, no matter how convenient the bikes are. For bike sharing to keep growing, cities must invest in the streets as well as the bikes.
Which finding, if true, would most strongly support the claim in paragraph 4?
A Bike-share riders are more likely to own cars than other residents. B Most bike-share trips happen on weekends. C Docking stations cost more to build than bike lanes. D In cities with many protected bike lanes, bike-share use is much higher than in similar cities with few such lanes.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 17 Topic 3.3 · Apply it
Social science: "Why Shared Bikes Spread" (1) In the last two decades, bike-sharing programs have appeared in hundreds of cities around the world. The idea is simple: riders pick up a bicycle at one station, ride it across town and leave it at another. Yet many of the earliest experiments with shared bikes, in the 1960s and 1970s, failed. Bikes left free on the street were often stolen or damaged, and no one was responsible for repairing them. (2) Modern systems have succeeded largely because of technology. Docking stations lock each bike in place, and riders unlock one with a card or a phone app that records who has it. Because every trip is linked to a user, bikes are far less likely to disappear. Sensors also tell operators which stations are running empty, so workers can move bikes to where they are needed. (3) Bike sharing has also benefited from a shift in how city planners think about streets. Many planners now see cycling not as a hobby but as part of the transportation system, like buses and trains. Shared bikes can cover the "last mile" between a train station and a rider's home or office, a trip that is often too long to walk comfortably but too short to be worth driving. (4) Still, bike sharing is not a cure for every city's problems. Systems work best where stations are close together and streets feel safe for cyclists. In neighborhoods with few protected bike lanes, many residents remain unwilling to ride, no matter how convenient the bikes are. For bike sharing to keep growing, cities must invest in the streets as well as the bikes.
Based on the passage as a whole, the author would most likely agree that:
A a transportation program's success depends partly on its surroundings. B technology is unimportant in transportation. C early bike-sharing programs were well designed. D cycling should be treated only as a hobby.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 18 Topic 3.1 · Apply it
Social science: "Why Shared Bikes Spread" (1) In the last two decades, bike-sharing programs have appeared in hundreds of cities around the world. The idea is simple: riders pick up a bicycle at one station, ride it across town and leave it at another. Yet many of the earliest experiments with shared bikes, in the 1960s and 1970s, failed. Bikes left free on the street were often stolen or damaged, and no one was responsible for repairing them. (2) Modern systems have succeeded largely because of technology. Docking stations lock each bike in place, and riders unlock one with a card or a phone app that records who has it. Because every trip is linked to a user, bikes are far less likely to disappear. Sensors also tell operators which stations are running empty, so workers can move bikes to where they are needed. (3) Bike sharing has also benefited from a shift in how city planners think about streets. Many planners now see cycling not as a hobby but as part of the transportation system, like buses and trains. Shared bikes can cover the "last mile" between a train station and a rider's home or office, a trip that is often too long to walk comfortably but too short to be worth driving. (4) Still, bike sharing is not a cure for every city's problems. Systems work best where stations are close together and streets feel safe for cyclists. In neighborhoods with few protected bike lanes, many residents remain unwilling to ride, no matter how convenient the bikes are. For bike sharing to keep growing, cities must invest in the streets as well as the bikes.
It can reasonably be inferred from paragraph 2 that sensors at docking stations help operators mainly by:
A charging riders for each trip. B measuring how fast riders travel. C repairing damaged bikes automatically. D showing where bikes need to be moved.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 19 Topic 3.1 · Apply it
Humanities: "Learning to See" (a personal essay) (1) For most of my life I believed I could not draw. My stick figures leaned like tired fence posts, and my attempts at faces looked like potatoes. So when a friend invited me to a weekly sketching group at the city museum, I almost said no. (2) The group's leader, a retired art teacher named Ms. Okafor, began the first session with an odd instruction. "Don't draw the statue," she said. "Draw what you actually see." I didn't understand the difference until I tried. When I drew a hand, I drew the hand I knew: five equal fingers spread like a star. But the marble hand in front of me was curled, and from where I sat two of its fingers were almost hidden. (3) That, I came to realize, was the real lesson. Drawing is less a skill of the hand than a habit of the eye. Most of the time we glance at things just long enough to name them (cup, tree, hand) and then stop looking. Sketching forces us to keep looking past the name, to notice the angle of a shadow or the way a sleeve folds. (4) I am still not a good artist, and my drawings rarely leave my notebook. But the habit has followed me out of the museum. On the bus I notice the shapes of people's hands on the railing; in the park I notice that no two leaves on a branch tilt the same way. I didn't learn to draw so much as I learned to see.
Which statement best expresses the main point of the passage?
A Anyone can become a professional artist with enough practice. B Sketching taught the narrator to look more carefully at the world. C Museums are the best places to learn to draw. D Ms. Okafor was the narrator's favorite teacher in school.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 20 Topic 3.2 · Apply it
Humanities: "Learning to See" (a personal essay) (1) For most of my life I believed I could not draw. My stick figures leaned like tired fence posts, and my attempts at faces looked like potatoes. So when a friend invited me to a weekly sketching group at the city museum, I almost said no. (2) The group's leader, a retired art teacher named Ms. Okafor, began the first session with an odd instruction. "Don't draw the statue," she said. "Draw what you actually see." I didn't understand the difference until I tried. When I drew a hand, I drew the hand I knew: five equal fingers spread like a star. But the marble hand in front of me was curled, and from where I sat two of its fingers were almost hidden. (3) That, I came to realize, was the real lesson. Drawing is less a skill of the hand than a habit of the eye. Most of the time we glance at things just long enough to name them (cup, tree, hand) and then stop looking. Sketching forces us to keep looking past the name, to notice the angle of a shadow or the way a sleeve folds. (4) I am still not a good artist, and my drawings rarely leave my notebook. But the habit has followed me out of the museum. On the bus I notice the shapes of people's hands on the railing; in the park I notice that no two leaves on a branch tilt the same way. I didn't learn to draw so much as I learned to see.
The first paragraph mainly serves to:
A describe the city museum. B explain how to draw faces. C establish the narrator's lack of confidence in drawing. D introduce Ms. Okafor's teaching methods.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 21 Topic 3.2 · Apply it
Humanities: "Learning to See" (a personal essay) (1) For most of my life I believed I could not draw. My stick figures leaned like tired fence posts, and my attempts at faces looked like potatoes. So when a friend invited me to a weekly sketching group at the city museum, I almost said no. (2) The group's leader, a retired art teacher named Ms. Okafor, began the first session with an odd instruction. "Don't draw the statue," she said. "Draw what you actually see." I didn't understand the difference until I tried. When I drew a hand, I drew the hand I knew: five equal fingers spread like a star. But the marble hand in front of me was curled, and from where I sat two of its fingers were almost hidden. (3) That, I came to realize, was the real lesson. Drawing is less a skill of the hand than a habit of the eye. Most of the time we glance at things just long enough to name them (cup, tree, hand) and then stop looking. Sketching forces us to keep looking past the name, to notice the angle of a shadow or the way a sleeve folds. (4) I am still not a good artist, and my drawings rarely leave my notebook. But the habit has followed me out of the museum. On the bus I notice the shapes of people's hands on the railing; in the park I notice that no two leaves on a branch tilt the same way. I didn't learn to draw so much as I learned to see.
The comparison of the narrator's stick figures to "tired fence posts" (paragraph 1) mainly suggests that the drawings looked:
A clumsy and lifeless. B carefully measured. C full of movement. D realistic.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 22 Topic 3.1 · Apply it
Humanities: "Learning to See" (a personal essay) (1) For most of my life I believed I could not draw. My stick figures leaned like tired fence posts, and my attempts at faces looked like potatoes. So when a friend invited me to a weekly sketching group at the city museum, I almost said no. (2) The group's leader, a retired art teacher named Ms. Okafor, began the first session with an odd instruction. "Don't draw the statue," she said. "Draw what you actually see." I didn't understand the difference until I tried. When I drew a hand, I drew the hand I knew: five equal fingers spread like a star. But the marble hand in front of me was curled, and from where I sat two of its fingers were almost hidden. (3) That, I came to realize, was the real lesson. Drawing is less a skill of the hand than a habit of the eye. Most of the time we glance at things just long enough to name them (cup, tree, hand) and then stop looking. Sketching forces us to keep looking past the name, to notice the angle of a shadow or the way a sleeve folds. (4) I am still not a good artist, and my drawings rarely leave my notebook. But the habit has followed me out of the museum. On the bus I notice the shapes of people's hands on the railing; in the park I notice that no two leaves on a branch tilt the same way. I didn't learn to draw so much as I learned to see.
Ms. Okafor's instruction "Draw what you actually see" asks students to:
A draw only statues of famous people. B draw details as they appear rather than as they assume them to be. C draw from memory after leaving the museum. D draw as quickly as possible.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 23 Topic 3.1 · Apply it
Humanities: "Learning to See" (a personal essay) (1) For most of my life I believed I could not draw. My stick figures leaned like tired fence posts, and my attempts at faces looked like potatoes. So when a friend invited me to a weekly sketching group at the city museum, I almost said no. (2) The group's leader, a retired art teacher named Ms. Okafor, began the first session with an odd instruction. "Don't draw the statue," she said. "Draw what you actually see." I didn't understand the difference until I tried. When I drew a hand, I drew the hand I knew: five equal fingers spread like a star. But the marble hand in front of me was curled, and from where I sat two of its fingers were almost hidden. (3) That, I came to realize, was the real lesson. Drawing is less a skill of the hand than a habit of the eye. Most of the time we glance at things just long enough to name them (cup, tree, hand) and then stop looking. Sketching forces us to keep looking past the name, to notice the angle of a shadow or the way a sleeve folds. (4) I am still not a good artist, and my drawings rarely leave my notebook. But the habit has followed me out of the museum. On the bus I notice the shapes of people's hands on the railing; in the park I notice that no two leaves on a branch tilt the same way. I didn't learn to draw so much as I learned to see.
According to paragraph 2, the narrator's first drawing of the hand was inaccurate because the narrator:
A sat too far away from the statue. B used the wrong kind of pencil. C drew a general idea of a hand instead of the curled hand in front of them. D drew the statue's other hand by mistake.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 24 Topic 3.2 · Apply it
Humanities: "Learning to See" (a personal essay) (1) For most of my life I believed I could not draw. My stick figures leaned like tired fence posts, and my attempts at faces looked like potatoes. So when a friend invited me to a weekly sketching group at the city museum, I almost said no. (2) The group's leader, a retired art teacher named Ms. Okafor, began the first session with an odd instruction. "Don't draw the statue," she said. "Draw what you actually see." I didn't understand the difference until I tried. When I drew a hand, I drew the hand I knew: five equal fingers spread like a star. But the marble hand in front of me was curled, and from where I sat two of its fingers were almost hidden. (3) That, I came to realize, was the real lesson. Drawing is less a skill of the hand than a habit of the eye. Most of the time we glance at things just long enough to name them (cup, tree, hand) and then stop looking. Sketching forces us to keep looking past the name, to notice the angle of a shadow or the way a sleeve folds. (4) I am still not a good artist, and my drawings rarely leave my notebook. But the habit has followed me out of the museum. On the bus I notice the shapes of people's hands on the railing; in the park I notice that no two leaves on a branch tilt the same way. I didn't learn to draw so much as I learned to see.
As it is used in paragraph 3, the word "habit" most nearly means:
A a piece of clothing. B an addiction. C a home. D a regular way of behaving.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 25 Topic 3.1 · Apply it
Humanities: "Learning to See" (a personal essay) (1) For most of my life I believed I could not draw. My stick figures leaned like tired fence posts, and my attempts at faces looked like potatoes. So when a friend invited me to a weekly sketching group at the city museum, I almost said no. (2) The group's leader, a retired art teacher named Ms. Okafor, began the first session with an odd instruction. "Don't draw the statue," she said. "Draw what you actually see." I didn't understand the difference until I tried. When I drew a hand, I drew the hand I knew: five equal fingers spread like a star. But the marble hand in front of me was curled, and from where I sat two of its fingers were almost hidden. (3) That, I came to realize, was the real lesson. Drawing is less a skill of the hand than a habit of the eye. Most of the time we glance at things just long enough to name them (cup, tree, hand) and then stop looking. Sketching forces us to keep looking past the name, to notice the angle of a shadow or the way a sleeve folds. (4) I am still not a good artist, and my drawings rarely leave my notebook. But the habit has followed me out of the museum. On the bus I notice the shapes of people's hands on the railing; in the park I notice that no two leaves on a branch tilt the same way. I didn't learn to draw so much as I learned to see.
According to paragraph 3, people usually stop looking at an object once they:
A have named it. B have touched it. C have drawn it. D have shown it to someone.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 26 Topic 3.3 · Apply it
Humanities: "Learning to See" (a personal essay) (1) For most of my life I believed I could not draw. My stick figures leaned like tired fence posts, and my attempts at faces looked like potatoes. So when a friend invited me to a weekly sketching group at the city museum, I almost said no. (2) The group's leader, a retired art teacher named Ms. Okafor, began the first session with an odd instruction. "Don't draw the statue," she said. "Draw what you actually see." I didn't understand the difference until I tried. When I drew a hand, I drew the hand I knew: five equal fingers spread like a star. But the marble hand in front of me was curled, and from where I sat two of its fingers were almost hidden. (3) That, I came to realize, was the real lesson. Drawing is less a skill of the hand than a habit of the eye. Most of the time we glance at things just long enough to name them (cup, tree, hand) and then stop looking. Sketching forces us to keep looking past the name, to notice the angle of a shadow or the way a sleeve folds. (4) I am still not a good artist, and my drawings rarely leave my notebook. But the habit has followed me out of the museum. On the bus I notice the shapes of people's hands on the railing; in the park I notice that no two leaves on a branch tilt the same way. I didn't learn to draw so much as I learned to see.
Which detail from paragraph 4 best supports the claim that the narrator's new habit has "followed me out of the museum"?
A "I am still not a good artist" B "my drawings rarely leave my notebook" C "On the bus I notice the shapes of people's hands on the railing" D "I didn't learn to draw"
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 27 Topic 3.3 · Apply it
Humanities: "Learning to See" (a personal essay) (1) For most of my life I believed I could not draw. My stick figures leaned like tired fence posts, and my attempts at faces looked like potatoes. So when a friend invited me to a weekly sketching group at the city museum, I almost said no. (2) The group's leader, a retired art teacher named Ms. Okafor, began the first session with an odd instruction. "Don't draw the statue," she said. "Draw what you actually see." I didn't understand the difference until I tried. When I drew a hand, I drew the hand I knew: five equal fingers spread like a star. But the marble hand in front of me was curled, and from where I sat two of its fingers were almost hidden. (3) That, I came to realize, was the real lesson. Drawing is less a skill of the hand than a habit of the eye. Most of the time we glance at things just long enough to name them (cup, tree, hand) and then stop looking. Sketching forces us to keep looking past the name, to notice the angle of a shadow or the way a sleeve folds. (4) I am still not a good artist, and my drawings rarely leave my notebook. But the habit has followed me out of the museum. On the bus I notice the shapes of people's hands on the railing; in the park I notice that no two leaves on a branch tilt the same way. I didn't learn to draw so much as I learned to see.
The narrator would most likely agree with which statement?
A Only talented people should take art classes. B Learning a new skill can change how a person experiences everyday life. C Drawing statues is more valuable than drawing people. D Looking closely at things is a waste of time.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 28 Topic 3.1 · Apply it
Natural science: two passages about why zebras have stripes Passage A For more than a century, scientists have debated why zebras have stripes. One long-standing idea is that stripes protect zebras from predators. When a herd runs, the stripes of many animals may blur together, making it hard for a lion or hyena to pick out a single target. Supporters of this view point out that zebras live in open grasslands, where hiding is difficult and confusing a predator could mean the difference between life and death. Passage B A growing body of research points to a smaller enemy: biting flies. In parts of Africa, horseflies and tsetse flies spread diseases that can be deadly to horses and their relatives. In one experiment, researchers put striped coats on horses and found that far fewer flies landed on them than on horses wearing plain coats. Video showed that flies approached the striped coats but failed to slow down properly, bumping into them or flying past. These results suggest that stripes may disrupt how flies judge where to land. Researchers also note that lions do not seem to have unusual difficulty catching zebras.
According to Passage A, stripes may protect zebras by:
A keeping them cool in the sun. B making it hard for predators to single out one animal in a running herd. C helping zebras recognize members of their own herd. D keeping biting flies away.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 29 Topic 3.1 · Apply it
Natural science: two passages about why zebras have stripes Passage A For more than a century, scientists have debated why zebras have stripes. One long-standing idea is that stripes protect zebras from predators. When a herd runs, the stripes of many animals may blur together, making it hard for a lion or hyena to pick out a single target. Supporters of this view point out that zebras live in open grasslands, where hiding is difficult and confusing a predator could mean the difference between life and death. Passage B A growing body of research points to a smaller enemy: biting flies. In parts of Africa, horseflies and tsetse flies spread diseases that can be deadly to horses and their relatives. In one experiment, researchers put striped coats on horses and found that far fewer flies landed on them than on horses wearing plain coats. Video showed that flies approached the striped coats but failed to slow down properly, bumping into them or flying past. These results suggest that stripes may disrupt how flies judge where to land. Researchers also note that lions do not seem to have unusual difficulty catching zebras.
In the experiment described in Passage B, the researchers compared:
A how fast zebras and horses could run. B the diseases carried by horseflies and tsetse flies. C how lions hunted zebras and horses. D the number of flies that landed on horses wearing striped coats and on horses wearing plain coats.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 30 Topic 3.1 · Apply it
Natural science: two passages about why zebras have stripes Passage A For more than a century, scientists have debated why zebras have stripes. One long-standing idea is that stripes protect zebras from predators. When a herd runs, the stripes of many animals may blur together, making it hard for a lion or hyena to pick out a single target. Supporters of this view point out that zebras live in open grasslands, where hiding is difficult and confusing a predator could mean the difference between life and death. Passage B A growing body of research points to a smaller enemy: biting flies. In parts of Africa, horseflies and tsetse flies spread diseases that can be deadly to horses and their relatives. In one experiment, researchers put striped coats on horses and found that far fewer flies landed on them than on horses wearing plain coats. Video showed that flies approached the striped coats but failed to slow down properly, bumping into them or flying past. These results suggest that stripes may disrupt how flies judge where to land. Researchers also note that lions do not seem to have unusual difficulty catching zebras.
According to Passage B, video of the experiment showed that flies:
A landed more often on the striped coats. B avoided the horses completely. C failed to slow down properly as they approached the striped coats. D were attracted to the plain coats by their color.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 31 Topic 3.2 · Apply it
Natural science: two passages about why zebras have stripes Passage A For more than a century, scientists have debated why zebras have stripes. One long-standing idea is that stripes protect zebras from predators. When a herd runs, the stripes of many animals may blur together, making it hard for a lion or hyena to pick out a single target. Supporters of this view point out that zebras live in open grasslands, where hiding is difficult and confusing a predator could mean the difference between life and death. Passage B A growing body of research points to a smaller enemy: biting flies. In parts of Africa, horseflies and tsetse flies spread diseases that can be deadly to horses and their relatives. In one experiment, researchers put striped coats on horses and found that far fewer flies landed on them than on horses wearing plain coats. Video showed that flies approached the striped coats but failed to slow down properly, bumping into them or flying past. These results suggest that stripes may disrupt how flies judge where to land. Researchers also note that lions do not seem to have unusual difficulty catching zebras.
In Passage B, the phrase "a smaller enemy" refers to:
A lions. B hyenas. C young zebras. D biting flies.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 32 Topic 3.2 · Apply it
Natural science: two passages about why zebras have stripes Passage A For more than a century, scientists have debated why zebras have stripes. One long-standing idea is that stripes protect zebras from predators. When a herd runs, the stripes of many animals may blur together, making it hard for a lion or hyena to pick out a single target. Supporters of this view point out that zebras live in open grasslands, where hiding is difficult and confusing a predator could mean the difference between life and death. Passage B A growing body of research points to a smaller enemy: biting flies. In parts of Africa, horseflies and tsetse flies spread diseases that can be deadly to horses and their relatives. In one experiment, researchers put striped coats on horses and found that far fewer flies landed on them than on horses wearing plain coats. Video showed that flies approached the striped coats but failed to slow down properly, bumping into them or flying past. These results suggest that stripes may disrupt how flies judge where to land. Researchers also note that lions do not seem to have unusual difficulty catching zebras.
The last sentence of Passage B mainly serves to:
A describe how lions hunt. B cast doubt on the explanation described in Passage A. C support the explanation described in Passage A. D explain how flies spread disease.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 33 Topic 3.3 · Apply it
Natural science: two passages about why zebras have stripes Passage A For more than a century, scientists have debated why zebras have stripes. One long-standing idea is that stripes protect zebras from predators. When a herd runs, the stripes of many animals may blur together, making it hard for a lion or hyena to pick out a single target. Supporters of this view point out that zebras live in open grasslands, where hiding is difficult and confusing a predator could mean the difference between life and death. Passage B A growing body of research points to a smaller enemy: biting flies. In parts of Africa, horseflies and tsetse flies spread diseases that can be deadly to horses and their relatives. In one experiment, researchers put striped coats on horses and found that far fewer flies landed on them than on horses wearing plain coats. Video showed that flies approached the striped coats but failed to slow down properly, bumping into them or flying past. These results suggest that stripes may disrupt how flies judge where to land. Researchers also note that lions do not seem to have unusual difficulty catching zebras.
The authors of both passages would most likely agree that:
A zebra stripes probably help zebras survive in some way. B biting flies are the only reason zebras have stripes. C the question of why zebras have stripes has been completely settled. D lions cannot see stripes.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 34 Topic 3.3 · Apply it
Natural science: two passages about why zebras have stripes Passage A For more than a century, scientists have debated why zebras have stripes. One long-standing idea is that stripes protect zebras from predators. When a herd runs, the stripes of many animals may blur together, making it hard for a lion or hyena to pick out a single target. Supporters of this view point out that zebras live in open grasslands, where hiding is difficult and confusing a predator could mean the difference between life and death. Passage B A growing body of research points to a smaller enemy: biting flies. In parts of Africa, horseflies and tsetse flies spread diseases that can be deadly to horses and their relatives. In one experiment, researchers put striped coats on horses and found that far fewer flies landed on them than on horses wearing plain coats. Video showed that flies approached the striped coats but failed to slow down properly, bumping into them or flying past. These results suggest that stripes may disrupt how flies judge where to land. Researchers also note that lions do not seem to have unusual difficulty catching zebras.
How would the researchers described in Passage B most likely respond to the idea in Passage A?
A By agreeing that predators are the main reason for stripes B By questioning it, noting that lions don't seem to have unusual difficulty catching zebras C By pointing out that zebras don't live in open grasslands D By arguing that stripes make zebras easier for predators to see
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 35 Topic 3.3 · Experiment
Natural science: two passages about why zebras have stripes Passage A For more than a century, scientists have debated why zebras have stripes. One long-standing idea is that stripes protect zebras from predators. When a herd runs, the stripes of many animals may blur together, making it hard for a lion or hyena to pick out a single target. Supporters of this view point out that zebras live in open grasslands, where hiding is difficult and confusing a predator could mean the difference between life and death. Passage B A growing body of research points to a smaller enemy: biting flies. In parts of Africa, horseflies and tsetse flies spread diseases that can be deadly to horses and their relatives. In one experiment, researchers put striped coats on horses and found that far fewer flies landed on them than on horses wearing plain coats. Video showed that flies approached the striped coats but failed to slow down properly, bumping into them or flying past. These results suggest that stripes may disrupt how flies judge where to land. Researchers also note that lions do not seem to have unusual difficulty catching zebras.
Which finding, if true, would most strengthen the explanation in Passage B?
A Zebras run faster than horses. B Lions hunt mostly at night. C Stripes painted on cattle reduced the number of biting flies landing on them. D Zebras live in larger herds than horses.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
Question 36 Topic 3.3 · Apply it
Natural science: two passages about why zebras have stripes Passage A For more than a century, scientists have debated why zebras have stripes. One long-standing idea is that stripes protect zebras from predators. When a herd runs, the stripes of many animals may blur together, making it hard for a lion or hyena to pick out a single target. Supporters of this view point out that zebras live in open grasslands, where hiding is difficult and confusing a predator could mean the difference between life and death. Passage B A growing body of research points to a smaller enemy: biting flies. In parts of Africa, horseflies and tsetse flies spread diseases that can be deadly to horses and their relatives. In one experiment, researchers put striped coats on horses and found that far fewer flies landed on them than on horses wearing plain coats. Video showed that flies approached the striped coats but failed to slow down properly, bumping into them or flying past. These results suggest that stripes may disrupt how flies judge where to land. Researchers also note that lions do not seem to have unusual difficulty catching zebras.
Unlike Passage A, Passage B:
A describes an experiment that tested its explanation. B mentions that zebras live in grasslands. C discusses predators such as lions. D argues that stripes have no purpose.
How sure are you? Sure Not sure ⚐ Flag for review
← Previous Next →